Month: June 2017

  • SUBLIMATION OF PAIN

    As a writer, I know from personal experience how cathartic it can be to put words on paper. This is especially true when the words represent a painful situation that I have not come to terms with yet. I also know this to be true in composing music. I can see how the painter or the sculptor can find therapy in the creation of their works as well. It must be true for the other arts as well. My primary focus here, however, is in reference to writing.

    I’m going to quote some informative content I found in the publication known as UCLA Newsroom, from its Science & Technology section. Stuart Wolpert wrote the piece in 2007. The following are excerpts from his article.

    “Why does putting our feelings into words — talking with a therapist or friend, writing in a journal — help us to feel better? A new brain imaging study by UCLA psychologists reveals why verbalizing our feelings makes our sadness, anger and pain less intense…

    “When people see a photograph of an angry or fearful face, they have increased activity in a region of the brain called the amygdala, which serves as an alarm to activate a cascade of biological systems to protect the body in times of danger. Scientists see a robust amygdala response even when they show such emotional photographs subliminally, so fast a person can’t even see them…”

    “The study showed that while the amygdala was less active when an individual labelled the feeling, another region of the brain was more active: the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. This region is located behind the forehead and eyes and has been associated with thinking in words about emotional experiences. It has also been implicated in inhibiting behavior and processing emotions, but exactly what it contributes has not been known.

     

    ” ‘What we’re suggesting is when you start thinking in words about your emotions —labeling emotions — that might be part of what the right ventrolateral region is responsible for,’ Lieberman said.

    “If a friend or loved one is sad or angry, getting the person to talk or write may have benefits beyond whatever actual insights are gained.These effects are likely to be modest, however, Lieberman said.

    ” ‘We typically think of language processing in the left side of the brain; however, this effect was occurring only in this one region, on the right side of the brain,’ he said. ‘It’s rare to see only one region of the brain responsive to a high-level process like labelling emotions.’

    Many people are not likely to realize why putting their feelings into words is helpful.

    ” ‘If you ask people who are really sad why they are writing in a journal, they are not likely to say it’s because they think this is a way to make themselves feel better,’ Lieberman said. ‘People don’t do this to intentionally overcome their negative feelings; it just seems to have that effect. Popular psychology says when you’re feeling down, just pick yourself up, but the world doesn’t work that way. If you know you’re trying to pick yourself up, it usually doesn’t work — self-deception is difficult. Because labelling your feelings doesn’t require you to want to feel better, it doesn’t have this problem.’

    “Thirty people, 18 women and 12 men between ages of 18 and 36, participated in Lieberman’s study at UCLA’s Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center.They viewed images of individuals making different emotional expressions. Below the picture of the face they either saw two words, such as ‘angry’ and ‘fearful,’ and chose which emotion described the face, or they saw two names, such as ‘Harry’ and ‘Sally,’ and chose the gender-appropriate name that matched the face.

    “Lieberman and his co-authors — UCLA assistant professor of psychology Naomi Eisenberger, former UCLA psychology undergraduate Molly Crockett, former UCLA psychology research assistant Sabrina Tom, UCLA psychology graduate student Jennifer Pfeifer and Baldwin Way, a postdoctoral fellow in Lieberman’s laboratory — used functional magnetic resonance imaging to study subjects’ brain activity.

    ” ‘When you attach the word ‘angry,’ you see a decreased response in the amygdala,’ Lieberman said. ‘When you attach the name ‘Harry,’you don’t see the reduction in the amygdala response.’

    ” ‘When you put feelings into words, you’re activating this prefrontal region and seeing a reduced response in the amygdala,’ he said. ‘In the same way you hit the brake when you’re driving when you see a yellow light, when you put feelings into words, you seem to be hitting the brakes on your emotional responses.’ ”

    As a result, an individual may feel less angry or less sad.”

    I find it satisfying to see scientific evidence to validate something I know to be true. I don’t mind having empirical evidence on my side either. So, write those feelings down. Write those heart-wrenching stories. Your brain will cooperate and you can move on with a little wisdom in your pocket.

     

  • FUNNY THING ABOUT HUMORISTS

     

    Image result for images of humorists at work

     

    In my most recent blog, I touched on the idea that we should have fun in our art, using a couple examples of offbeat humor that plays with language in a humorous way. I’d like to carry this theme out in a more direct manner this time. Let’s take a good look at humorists.

    The funny thing about humorists for me is that I didn’t know what I was talking about when I was talking about humorists. I thought they were distinguished from all the other purveyors of comedy by the fact they did humor in writing. I knew Mark Twain was a humorist. Dave Barry is a great one of our time. Erma Bombeck was arguably the greatest female humorist, at least in the United States. I looked upon Garrison Keillor as a humorist. And he is. But if I had limited him to writing, he would have failed my test because he uses his humor verbally as well as in print. Merriam-Webster defines humorist as “a person specializing in or noted for humor.”

    Well, this just about ruins my whole premise for this article. A stand-up comic qualifies, a vaudeville team also. Comedic actors, puppeteers, class clowns even–they all fit the description under that definition. Is there no special place in humor heaven for the classiest of them all? I feel like lodging a protest to the Keepers of the Wit in all nations of the world to maintain order, to set the scribes of humor apart and above those who would bring us laughter with the mere telling of a joke or goading us with a sight gag. Alas, was it just my misunderstanding of a word that had me construct this castle of sand for my fellow writers?

    So now I’m looking to see who others consider the greatest humorists, whether current or in the past. The all-time greats as listed by the website Ranker, Vote on Everything, look like this for the Top 10:

    1) Mark Twain

    2) Oscar Wilde

    3) Frank Zappa

    4) Dr. Seuss

    5) Aisha Tyler

    Image result for images of aisha tyler

    6) Linwood Barclay

    7) Ambrose Bierce

    8) Al Clouston

    9) Woody Allen

    10) Terry Pratchett

    Ranker goes on to list their Top 100. Here’s what they have to say about humorists. “A list of humorists, both old and new. A humorist is a writer who specializes in humorous material. Unlike comedy writers though, who go for all-out laughs, humorist writers are more subtle and cerebral. But don’t take that to mean they’re any less funny. One of the most famous humorists in the United States is Jean Shepherd, who narrated and co-wrote the movie A Christmas Story, which is based on his autobiographical short stories. The humorists on this list are some of the best, and well worth a read if you’re looking for something that’ll amuse and make you smile.”

    Okay, I feel a little better about my comprehension of the humorist. The only problem is I don’t even know who half of the Top 10 are. I won’t embarrass myself by admitting to those with whom I’m not familiar. If you’re reading this, you might be bound to say, “You never heard of ___________?” Imagine how I did with the rest of the Top 100. I’m at least relieved to find some of my absolute favorites on the list. In my personal critique, I made sure to notice there are some missing who I think should be mentioned. Inevitable, right? But enough of the lists and the quibbling over definitions. Let’s just get to the heart of the matter–the priceless humor.

    From the man who kept getting in trouble as a newspaper editor…

    “Get your facts first. Then you can distort them as you please.” –Mark Twain

    From the unlisted Steven Wright: “The girl I’m seeing now, Rachel, is a very pretty girl. She has emerald eyes and long, flowing plaid hair. The last week in August, we went camping way up in Canada. We were laying around in the woods and stuff, and I don’t know how she did it but she got poison ivy on her brain and the only way she can scratch it is if she thinks about sandpaper.”

    From George Carlin: “Have you ever noticed that anyone driving slower than you is an idiot and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?”

    From Fran Lebowitz: “My favorite way to wake up is to have a certain French movie star whisper to me softly at two-thirty in the afternoon that if I want to get to Sweden in time to pick up my Nobel Prize for Literature I had better ring for breakfast. This occurs rather less often than one might wish.”

    From Art Buchwald, who said in 1987: “This is not an easy time for humorists because the government is far funnier than we are.”

    The greatest ones’ material is timeless.