Month: July 2023

  • NARRATING OUR LIVES

    Many of us have a running commentary in our heads about what we’re doing or what’s happening to us. There usually aren’t full sentences, but rather fragments or expletives or moans or groans or cheers. At times we’ll be muttering our complaints about how we’ve been treated or how we could have done better in a given situation. If we weren’t doing this, we could be simply being and experiencing instead of judging and grading and resisting. Some of us may be sailing through with a rosy outlook and gratitude for whatever comes our way. Blessed be the undisturbed, for they will know The Way. I believe, however, a lot of us are making ourselves miserable, to one degree or another, with internally narrating our lives in a negative way. Whether or not this applies to you, I invite you to read on. I will share some insights on the human inclination to do play-by-play on the game of life.

    What is This Tendency?

    For many centuries, philosophers have made mention of people talking to themselves. It may be silent or aloud, but we have been addressing ourselves for probably as long as we’ve had brains to convey the exchange. It was only in the late 20th century that psychologists began formally theorizing it.

    An article written in Frontiers in Psychology in 2020 and published on the National Library of Medicine website “explores the relationships among different types of internal dialogues and self-talk functions.” The writers of the paper lump internal dialogue and self-talk under the broader term “intrapersonal communication.” There are other modes of intrapersonal communication, but for our purposes I’m going to focus on the above two modes.

    The article cites a study that says self-talk is a self-regulatory tool used by all of us at times. We use it to calm ourselves with such phrases as “Don’t worry” or “You can get through this.” A different context might call for something like “Ah-h, the finish line!” With self-talk, the sender and the receiver are usually assumed to be the same person. The message can be one word, sound, command or such without an answer or extended conversation. It’s essentially an internal monologue.

    With internal dialogue, the communication becomes more complex. There may be multiple parties with multiple voices exchanging statements, all within one mind. The primary way it’s used is to help a person work out how to handle new or strange experiences. Have you ever had a conversation that went disturbingly wrong and you ran through it over and over again, maybe revising it to have you saying something much more sensible or courageous?

    I tend to think internal monologues or dialogues are habit-forming and we can come to depend on them. I believe the same is true of self-talk. My wife and I find it amusing that we punctuate the completion of tasks large and small with a quiet “Okay” as we walk around the house.

    Psychologists view these mental exchanges as a natural phenomenon. Some experience them more than others and supposedly some don’t experience them at all. In most cases, this phenomenon need not be a cause for worry.

    When it’s Not So Good

    The mental health professionals tell us when our voices go unusually negative, it’s time to seek help. Specifically, when we’re having thoughts of harming ourselves or others, we may be losing control and need to rein in the mind.

    While I take that advice very seriously, I wish to turn our attention to a lesser problem that we may not see as a problem at all. I’m referring to the everyday narrative hounding us constantly, which tells us the unsatisfactory state of our world. It’s an insidious element of our minds, steering us to the negative as it slyly pretends we’re perfectly fine thinking that way.

    I have long looked upon myself as a positive person with a relatively cheery outlook. I’m known to be sarcastic sometimes, but even then I usually try to lace my comments with a non-caustic thread of humor. Only in the last couple of years have I started to see my glasses aren’t as rose-colored as I thought they were.

    As a part of an intensified yoga practice, I spend a little time each day in introspection. I examine how I behave and where my thoughts go. I’ve noticed more than a few negative behaviors, among them being my reactions to what happens in everyday life. Over the two years plus, I’ve seen how I generate my own misery in my reactions. Here are some examples of mine that you (a good, seemingly positive person) may notice in yourself. A few minutes ago, I picked up a folder of papers from my desk and dropped some of the contents on the floor. I cursed, as though that was a really big deal. I could be watering plants when the hose kinks. I might sigh in annoyance and walk back to the spot of the kink with agitation. I’m driving to an appointment, running a little behind, and groan when a green light turns red. When my novel Boundless Trust was published, I realized I misspelled a word in the last sentence of the book. I had a talk with myself internally about that, wondering how I could have made that mistake. I still cringe with embarrassment when I think about it.

    Being in the Moment

    We don’t need the self-judgment, the negation or the commentary at all. It’s all ego, yakking at us through our brains. I believe we are here first and foremost to simply be. Without our baggage, we are unencumbered by thoughts and matter. But, hey, thinking is a tough habit to break. If you have to think, then choose to be cheerful and forgiving. As you make your way through your day, accept who you are and what happens. You’ll be a lot happier if you do.

  • THE GREAT CONVERSATIONALISTS (THEN AND NOW)

    In my last post, I covered the satisfaction deep conversation gives us. I broke it down and ended with a few wonderful quotes on the subject, but I had some residual attention on the famous people who have excelled as conversationalists. In this article, I want to shine a light on the best ever and some who are worthy of mention and are actually alive now. Let’s begin with the all-time greats and finish with those who we can relate to presently in a world which is a far cry from yesteryear.

    Ancients

    Socrates: This iconic Greek philosopher, born in 469 B.C., is probably unmatched in his crafting of conversation. Having gained a grand reputation as a philosopher and a wise man, he was reluctant to give his opinion on practically anything. He would rise early and go to places where people gathered, engaging any person who seemed likely to provide him with stimulating or amusing discussion. He was known to call for the definition of a large concept, then to reveal its incompleteness, its contradictory content or its absurdity. He led on the participants with questions they would respond to with a fuller and more complete definition, which he himself never completed with his own answer. His mastery of conversation enabled him to direct the flow of the exchange of ideas with groups. He answered his critics who complained about his unwillingness to come right out with his own ideas, saying “the god compels me to be a midwife, but forbids me to bring forth.” He didn’t profess to teach anything more than the art of examining ideas.

    Teng Shih: Sometimes called the Socrates of China, this lawyer and philosopher lived in the fifth century, BC. He was a famous intellectual rebel who taught right and wrong were relative and not absolute. He could argue endlessly in favor and against various moral positions. Teng eventually composed a code of penology that the government found to be too idealistic. He posted them where the common folk could easily see them. The prime minister prohibited the posting of pamphlets in public places. Teng then delivered them to people in person. The minister forbade the delivery and Teng smuggled them to his readers, concealed in other articles. The government answered this disobedience by beheading him.

    Renaissance

    Martin Luther: The architect of the Christian Reformation was a gregarious man. He wrote a lot in his famous pamphlets, but he was known to immerse himself in discussion regularly. He and his wife Katerina were generous and hospitable. They were known to have a wide variety of people at their home for dinner. Luther would initiate stimulating and meaningful discussion by asking those around the table about their views on current issues or debates. Sometimes, he would start with his own commentary on the news of the day. They often had students staying with them and it was their inclination to take notes on Luther’s quotable statements. There were at least eight editions of these, compiled in a series titled Table Talk. As students came and went over the years, they had volumes of his sayings recorded for posterity.

    Early Modern Period

    Catherine de Vivonne, marquise de Rambouillet: This society hostess and French social leader forged a place in history as a huge influence on the development of French literature. As Britannica puts it, “Revolted by the coarseness of the French court under Henry IV and distressed by the amount of political intrigue, she set out to establish at her townhouse, the Hôtel de Rambouillet, a salon devoted to literature and cultured conversation where nobles and men of letters could mingle on an equal footing.”

    Catherine’s establishment of this forum and her own communication with a rich sense of humor made the salon a vital part of cultured society for hundreds of years.

    Contemporary

    Bill Moyers: I have found it difficult to come up with truly great conversationalists in our era. There are some amazing speakers, such as politicians like Winston Churchill and brilliant comics like George Carlin. There have been a number of astute interviewers, William F. Buckley Jr., Dick Cavett and Barbara Walters to name just a few. Of those stellar personalities, one stands out as more than just an interviewer. Bill Moyers’ career as a journalist led to decades as a TV interviewer. He has said he thinks of television as a campfire, where he gathers sensitive people to talk, to listen and to enjoy a shared experience. With his probing questions and expansive responses, he would jointly develop a topic with his many guests in a way that brought greater understanding about matters of tremendous substance and depth.

    Terry Gross: I came to choose Ms. Gross in a roundabout way. I’ve thought of her as an incredible interviewer, so she didn’t identify in my mind as a pure conversationalist. As I wrote above, real conversation was no longer part of public culture. Then it hit me. Podcasts engender a bounty of excellent conversation, and they have become so popular, there are a remarkable number of people taking part in stimulating, complex, nuanced and intelligent discussions across our country.

    I admit I haven’t listened to enough podcasts to know for myself who the best hosts are, so I did a search to find out. The Top 15 Famous Podcasts list gave me the most popular ones, such as Joe Rogan, Ashley Flowers, Ben Shapiro, and Keith Morrison. My podcast junkie daughter suggested Jordan Harbinger as one who qualifies as an outstanding conversationalist. He seems like a real natural. However, when I learned Fresh Air, the radio show Terry Gross hosts, is now a podcast, I couldn’t help but nominate her. For a long time, I’ve admired her show and her easy manner of carrying on a conversation with her guests. Yeah, it’s an interview, but I’m convinced she goes off-script when the discussion invites her to probe deeper as a guest surprises her with an answer to a question. She adds her take when appropriate, and that adds value to the conversation. She draws information into the open with ease and skill I’ve rarely seen.

    So, yes, I’m giving Terry Gross a spot on this list of all-time great conversationalists. I believe she deserves it. Yet, there could have been so many others from this culture of podcasters. I’ve heard quite a bit of stellar conversation from hosts I’ve overheard in our daughter’s listening around the house when she’s not wearing the headphones. Ms. Gross is somewhat famous, has a proven track record in public conversing and she has a voice I could listen to all day.

    Talkative Times

    I see this as a golden age for conversationalists. The podcast has risen to the heights of entertainment. Although I’m not a fan of some of the content and what I see as weak use of language with the over-use of profanity and an unnecessary presence of professional “laughers,” I recognize the brilliant interaction between people developing thought into perceptive conversation.